Playful Friday [4]: Type 1
 
Type 1, striving to feel perfect: they notice mistakes, gaps, and imperfections, and want to fix them, often starting with themselves.
 
Type 1: Likely to say:
 
“I can’t relax until everything is in its place.”
“I just want to do the right thing, but sometimes I get stuck in the details.”
“If I’m not careful, I’ll end up lecturing everyone about the best way to do things.”
“I know I should be more flexible, but I can’t help it when things feel wrong.”
“I’m not nagging, I’m just trying to make sure we don’t make the same mistake again.”
“Why is it always me who cares?”
“If I have too much fun, I might lose control.”
 
Type 1: Unlikely to say:
 
“I don’t mind making mistakes, they’re just part of the learning process.”
“I never care what other people think of me; if I make a social gaffe, we’ll just laugh it off together.”
“I don’t mind if things are a bit messy or if we cut corners.”
“I never notice when something is wrong or could be improved.”
“I’m happy to let things slide and not say anything.”
“I never worry about whether I’m doing the right thing.”
 
 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  Every day we follow unique patterns in the way we feel, think, and act. Some of us react to stress with endless organizing, others by rallying friends, and some by searching for what’s next.   The Enneagram is a map; a way to recognize the recurring routes we all take in daily life. It shines a light on the habits that shape our relationships, work, and self-view.   Most importantly, it’s not about labelling who you are, but discovering which strategies you tend to use. Curious which everyday patterns might be shaping your life? Stay tuned as we look at how the Enneagram describes patterns in motion, never boxes you in.     #enneagram #the2denneagram #Personality
Read more
  Whether the Enneagram is “scientific” depends on what is meant by that word, but it can still be used in a disciplined, testable way.   Do models have to be scientific?   Plenty of tools are useful without being born in a lab or backed by decades of formal studies. Everyday examples include: Weather forecasts people use that are based on imperfect models but still guide decisions. Economic or market forecasts that help planning even though they are not exact sciences. Many coaching and leadership frameworks that are descriptive maps of behaviour rather than strict scientific theories. The Enneagram, understood as a descriptive model of patterns, belongs more in this “useful map” category than in the same box as, say, a medical diagnostic test.    Using the scientific method with the Enneagram.    Even if the Enneagram was not originally “based on science”, it can still be approached with a scientific attitude. Karl Popper argued that what makes somet...
Read more
  Playful Friday [2]:   Today’s theme: Navigators.   Navigators are tuned in to group dynamics, status, and unspoken rules: “Who’s here, how do they relate, and where do I fit?”   Navigator: Likely to say   “Wait, who’s coming, and how do they all know each other?” “I just want to understand the dynamics before I jump in.” “I’m fine to sit back and watch for a bit; I’m mapping the room.” “I keep mental notes of who gets along with whom… it’s useful.” “If we invite them, how will that shift the vibe of the group?” “I don’t need to be centre stage, but I like knowing what’s going on behind it.” “I’m not gossiping, I’m gathering data.” “I feel better when I know where I stand with people.” “I know I should care more about money and maintenance, but I get bored with all that ‘nest admin’.”    Navigator: Unlikely to say   “I never think about what other people think of me.” “Groups are just random individuals; I don’t really notice any patterns.” “I ha...
Read more