Myth Monday [9]: Type 9
 
Myth:
“Nines are too passive and lazy to be leaders or CEOs.”
 
Reality:
In practice, Type 9s often show up in leadership; after Threes and Eights, they are among the most common types leading organisations and teams. 
 
Their style is usually quieter, but it brings real advantages: they listen well, defuse conflict, seek harmony, and are generally likeable, which makes it easier for people across the organisation to work with them.
Rather than charging ahead or chasing visibility, many Nines lead by creating stability, drawing out different perspectives, and helping everyone feel included.
 
What can look from the outside like passivity is often a deliberate focus on consensus and calm, which, in complex systems full of competing agendas, is exactly what keeps things moving without blowing up.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  Every day we follow unique patterns in the way we feel, think, and act. Some of us react to stress with endless organizing, others by rallying friends, and some by searching for what’s next.   The Enneagram is a map; a way to recognize the recurring routes we all take in daily life. It shines a light on the habits that shape our relationships, work, and self-view.   Most importantly, it’s not about labelling who you are, but discovering which strategies you tend to use. Curious which everyday patterns might be shaping your life? Stay tuned as we look at how the Enneagram describes patterns in motion, never boxes you in.     #enneagram #the2denneagram #Personality
Read more
  Whether the Enneagram is “scientific” depends on what is meant by that word, but it can still be used in a disciplined, testable way.   Do models have to be scientific?   Plenty of tools are useful without being born in a lab or backed by decades of formal studies. Everyday examples include: Weather forecasts people use that are based on imperfect models but still guide decisions. Economic or market forecasts that help planning even though they are not exact sciences. Many coaching and leadership frameworks that are descriptive maps of behaviour rather than strict scientific theories. The Enneagram, understood as a descriptive model of patterns, belongs more in this “useful map” category than in the same box as, say, a medical diagnostic test.    Using the scientific method with the Enneagram.    Even if the Enneagram was not originally “based on science”, it can still be approached with a scientific attitude. Karl Popper argued that what makes somet...
Read more
  Playful Friday [2]:   Today’s theme: Navigators.   Navigators are tuned in to group dynamics, status, and unspoken rules: “Who’s here, how do they relate, and where do I fit?”   Navigator: Likely to say   “Wait, who’s coming, and how do they all know each other?” “I just want to understand the dynamics before I jump in.” “I’m fine to sit back and watch for a bit; I’m mapping the room.” “I keep mental notes of who gets along with whom… it’s useful.” “If we invite them, how will that shift the vibe of the group?” “I don’t need to be centre stage, but I like knowing what’s going on behind it.” “I’m not gossiping, I’m gathering data.” “I feel better when I know where I stand with people.” “I know I should care more about money and maintenance, but I get bored with all that ‘nest admin’.”    Navigator: Unlikely to say   “I never think about what other people think of me.” “Groups are just random individuals; I don’t really notice any patterns.” “I ha...
Read more